• Users Online: 367
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 147

Oral verruca vulgaris

1 Mercy Multispeciality Dental Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 GP Multispeciality Hospital, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication19-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Karthik Shunmugavelu
Mercy Multispeciality Dental Centre, 8/27, Parvathipuram 1st Street, Thiruneermalai Main Road, Chrompet, Chennai - 600 044, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2468-838X.196111

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Shunmugavelu K, Gopalakrishnan P. Oral verruca vulgaris. BLDE Univ J Health Sci 2016;1:147

How to cite this URL:
Shunmugavelu K, Gopalakrishnan P. Oral verruca vulgaris. BLDE Univ J Health Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Oct 17];1:147. Available from: https://www.bldeujournalhs.in/text.asp?2016/1/2/147/196111

Dear Sir,

A 50-year-old female patient was referred to the Department of Dentistry and Faciomaxillary Surgery with presentation of discomfort in relation to the inner part of the left cheek. The patient was conscious, oriented, and afebrile. Vitals were stable. Medical history, dental history, drug allergy history, and occupational and personal history were not relevant. Mouth opening and lateral temporomandibular joint movements were satisfactory. Occlusion was stable. Extraoral examination was of no relevance. Intraoral examination revealed painless, exophytic, sessile mass measuring 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm in relation to left buccal mucosa [Figure 1]. Differential diagnosis included oral verruca vulgaris, oral squamous cell carcinoma, oral leukoplakia, oral verrucous carcinoma, oral lichen planus, and oral squamous papilloma. Under local anesthesia in combination with adrenaline 1:200,000, the mass was surgically excised and sent for histopathological examination. Histopathologically, there were parakeratosis, acanthosis with occasional koilocytes, irregular papillomatosis, mild subepithelial lymphocytic infiltrate, and inward bending of rete ridges at both margins suggestive of oral verruca vulgaris.
Figure 1: Intraoral clinical view of the exophytic mass in relation to the left buccal mucosa

Click here to view

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


  [Figure 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded185    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal